Khaki Lackey

Our players? We have like, 2 decent players on offense. If there was ever a time to radically change our scheme, it's now. I'm tired of the notion that we're always going to have to use a power run scheme because our sorry OLine can't pass protect. It's not going to happen overnight, but we don't have many strengths to play to right now.

I don’t watch much college ball, and I’m not a QB expert. I was lead to believe by many media talking heads and many posters on here that Bryce’s size was his only limitation. I just assumed that his footwork, mechanics, and accuracy were really sound. That didn’t turn out to be the case. What are some examples of a QB with questionable mechanics that were corrected after some time in the league? I can’t think of any. Give me some hope here.

I like the guy and hoping for the best. My two main concerns: 1.) Is he going to be given time to install his vision. We've been trying to convert to an offense that's this side of 1986 and it's going to take more than one off season to do it, especially when you consider our current draft capital situation. Unfortunately, if recent history is any indicator, he has around 10 regular season games to pull it off. So does he work with the pieces we currently have? i.e. run a 1980s power run offense? Transition gradually? Rip the band aid off and suck for another season or two? Tough spot. 2.) He seems too nice and positive. Gives me a little bit of Frank Reich vibe. Tepp-dawg seems to gravitate towards agreeable people that he can steamroller. Hopefully either Bryce gets fixed or people realize that Bryce's limitations are the actual problem.

Well, we've tried the 1,000 years of NFL experience approach...

Frank Reich had 3 his first four years in Indy.

Maybe it’s because I’m old and seen the movie too many times, but waiting a decade to lose a Super Bowl just doesn’t do it for me anymore. Some people are content to ride the C+ average to a high school diploma. I want better.

.500 win percentage, no consecutive winning seasons, and playoffs every three years or so, and no Súper bowls. (In case you missed the two decades we did that.)

The only way that this hire would make sense is if Morgan has been on the record disagreeing with damn near every personnel move since he's been here and Tepp thought, "If I had listened to this guy, we'd be in great shape." Extremely unlikely.

Greg Hardy for Asst. GM?

I don't see how a guy that lobbied for the job that his BFF just got sh!t-canned from is going to fix the toxic "hunger games" culture in the organization.

Fox and Rivera were .500 coaches that could never put together back to back winning seasons. Wilks was worse than both. Yes, I’m aware .500 is better than what we’ve been lately, but if that’s your bar, don’t be surprised if NFL owners/coaches/athletes are expected to strive for better than that. I swear, Wilks fans are worse than Bryce defenders. Yes, I know, we get to lose a super bowl every decade with the 1986 model. Hurray

The real question is, is the team going to transition into an offense that’s this side of 1988 and is the owner is patient enough to let someone competent build it.

So we’re going to get a snake oil salesman that charms Tepper. That sounds familiar.

Wilks is a great coach? Lol yeah if you like a 1986 offense and a .500 record. (That’s not counting his dismal record in AZ. I’ll give the Wilks fans credit. Their longing for a .500 record is better than the Bryce fans beating the drum for a 2-15 QB. This message board must be loaded with people that were content with a C- average and a high school diploma ceiling.

In the extremely unlikely chance that a billionaire NFL owner reads this poo show of a message board, he's probably aware that the OP is a total payaso. But Haslam gets draft picks from intoxicated hobos, so who knows?

Is hiring a coach before hiring a permanent GM a new thing or is that just something Tepper keeps trying? It seems like letting a GM hire a coach has never been discussed as an option in the Tepper era.

Not if he's going behind the coach's back and undermining him. He'd probably do the same to the new GM. Scott needs to go.

This guy's take isn't that great. Any coach that comes to Carolina, is risking getting Reich'ed. If you're going to risk getting your reputation ruined, you need guaranteed retirement money.

eg. Ron Rivera every odd numbered year

If you're old enough to not know what a boombox is, I'm surprised you're able to use a computer, or still be on this side of the grass.

They probably were probably inserted by an artificial stupidity program.

Supposedly, when Tepper wanted Ron to switch to 3-4, Ron went along with it because 3-4 OLB edge rushers were easier to find than traditional 4-3 bookend DEs. Hence the drafting of Burns. Who knows how much of that is true. I was hoping to see Burns thrive this year. At this point it would probably be another step back if we switched back.

Sure. Why not. Hit me.

Fitterer should have been gone long before Reich.

Another win or two and Tabor might gain some Wilks/Chuck Norris-like mythological legend status.