Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Again, I specifically pointed out trading next year's first was bad. I am talking value based on where a player was selected. Pick 15 and pick 26. Both players were a big time need for them and both players were expected to go earlier.
  3. I like Sheena but she's been getting played & baited hard this entire draft process
  4. again you were telling me the same fuging thing about XL last year and me being negative. How is that working out for you now?
  5. Obviously. David Newton thinks it's a good pick. On a more serious note, Shadeur Sanders at 57.
  6. You are confusing pre-draft prospect rankings with NFL performances.
  7. If we can get him to approach anywhere close to Mike Evans territory, he'll be a key part of our team. Excited we have a natural catcher with size. Still would like to get a shifty speedster next year, but that can wait.
  8. So much depends on the sources you lean on--I am very excited about the edge group today--more than yesterday, to be honest, if you consider fit and value.
  9. I mean TMac and Bryce were practicing together in a top secret underground bunker somewhere out in the Cali desert. Area 51 ain't got poo on our smoke screens. This pick was inevitable.
  10. TMac is just a case of prospect fatigue. Watching some of his highlights I'm surprised he played as well as he did with that QB play...
  11. In addition to filling a GLARING need, there’s such a strong case he was simply the best and cleanest prospect on the board. I’m very pleased with how they approached last night.
  12. I think there's a big difference between "the Cowboy wanted T-Mac" and "Micah Parsons wanted T-Mac." If Luke Kuechly had said he wanted a player, I'd listen regardless of who our idiot GM was at the time.
  13. I'm not ready to give up on XL yet either. I'm hoping that lingering wrist injury was really impacting his hands.
  14. His route running looks just fine to me, Dave Canales even shouted out how he "reduces" his routes really well which will get him separation.
  15. I told you Brugler has him ranked as WR3 in the 24 class? What are you even talking about with your endless whining? You said he would be WR6 in last year's class. I gave you two different solid sources disputing that. Now you are crying about pick 32 from last year and comparing it? Maybe you need to get some fresh air and decompress for a little bit....
  16. Yep. Back to back 1,300 yard seasons is nothing to scoff at. He's produced and he's got the measurables, rather than the XL method of he's got the measurables but hasn't produced as much.
  17. we "stole" marshall from the saints we "stole" Brooks from the Cowboys we "stole" Tmac from the cowboys I am sensing a trend here and oh by the way the cowboys think Mingo can be a good wr. hmmmmm
  18. This is a good one to watch for those that don’t like the pick
  19. Also, our HC made his bread and butter with WRs, so let’s see what he thinks he got himself with one worth 8 overall. I think people are getting lost at Canales’ potential input - the presser seemed to show he had a very good grasp on what Tmac was bringing and the type of infrastructure he wants here.
  20. Yeah the Golden stuff truly made no sense to me, glad we did not end up with him.
  21. If Cleveland doesn't take him I'm not sure who will. It's clear the league doesn't think as highly of him as he and his merry band of enablers do.
  22. Not a bad plan. Of the elite QBs, Bryce probably most closely fits the Brees mold.
  23. no fuging way tet is a better prospect then thomas or ladd, come on man
  1. Load more activity
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      45,312
    • Most Online
      4,802

    Newest Member
    PanthersUSN
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...